Every output faces a hostile reviewer scored on finding defects.
The reviewer agent is incentivized to find problems, not confirm quality. It’s scored on defect discovery rate, not agreement rate. This inverts the typical review dynamic where reviewers rubber-stamp to avoid conflict.
Our adversarial reviewer scored a deliverable 37/100 that three competitor tools rated 100/100. The 37 was correct — the deliverable had subtle specification violations that surface-level analysis missed. Hostile review catches what polite review doesn’t.
Configure a dedicated reviewer agent with: defect-finding incentive structure, access to the original specification, no knowledge of implementation intent, and a scoring rubric weighted toward false negatives (missing real problems) over false positives.
Book a technical assessment. See how these principles apply to your specific challenge.
Complimentary 30-minute technical assessment. No commitments.